Mobile

4G phones: The promise and the peril - FierceWireless

via www.fiercewireless.com

Beyond simply explaining what 4G is and the benefits it will bring, carriers will have to answer the question: What can I do with 4G that I can't do with a 3G smartphone?

Read more: http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/4g-phones-promise-and-peril/2010-04-09?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal#ixzz0kuDFJeVX

This is exactly why I think VZ will do iPhone at the launch of LTE, if any. Historically, it is evident that either the shiny new gadget or the dramatic pricing plan is the only way to successfully move subscribers to the new spectrum or network. People don't care about the network technology - all they care about is what you can do with the phone.

Michi

Japanese "seclusion(sakoku)" spectrum policy can be a suicide

The heated debate about Japan's spectrum policy has erupted among the industry experts lately.  We call it "spectrum seclusion(Sakoku)".

Just as in the U.S., Japanese broadcasters are vacating 700MHz spectrum in July 2011, and the regulatory body is currently considering how to allocate this precious 700MHz band.  Luckily, 700MHz is the same as the U.S. and other parts of the world for next gen spectrum band.  700MHz has also very desirable technical features for mobile service, so it is designated as the next gen spectrum by  APT Wireless Forum, the wireless standard body in Asia/Pacific.

In Japan, however, the available spectrum is "not enough" to be shared by 3 major mobile carriers, so the government is proposing to pair 700MHz and 900MHz, instead of the standard up/down link in 700Mhz.

I believe that it is insane to use such "orphan" spectrum, at this time in the 21st century.  True, until 3G migration, Japan allocated up and down link in reverse manner from the international standard.  10 years ago, another orphan spectrum 1.5GHz was put to use in Japan.  They could get away with it because the things were different in the past.  The global wireless market was much more fragmented back then, and Japan was relatively big market among them.  Japanese domestic vendors were much more powerful, as well.  Carriers could somehow manage to procure chips and equipments at reasonable price levels for the orphan spectrum.

Now, the global air interface standard is contracting into LTE.  The big divide between GSM/W-CDMA and CDMA camps are fading away.  Huge emerging markets are now the biggest customers for chips and equipments.  And Japanese vendors are now weakening, as they could not get hold of the global market due to the Japanese market's isolation.

If they go ahead with this orphan spectrum paring, there is no guarantee that international vendors such as Qualcomm and Huawei would provide the "special" products for Japan timely and reasonably.  Japanese vendors who are forced to produce them would lose the opportunity to sell the same products globally, again.  Without the scale, Japanese consumers will be left with more expensive, less innovative products.

I particularly am concerned because it would deter the advancement of M2M or embedded devices, which I believe will be the next frontier of the mobile service.  I was hoping that Japanese consumer electronics vendors would tackle on this opportunity, but so far, I don't see too many movement on this front.  M2M (machine to machine) has been on the market for some time, mostly in automotive telematics and utility telemetering area, but now the usage has just started to expand to other products.  The best example is Amazon Kindle. Radio is embedded in the device, and the users don't have to pay subscription fees - the underlining wireless is hidden in the e-book prices.  For the next gen spectrum, I believe that there many such products pop up.  For such products, the chip/equipment prices have to be very low, and to make it happen, the vendor has to scale.  To catch up with this trend, the vendors HAS to mass-produce the products.

The Ministry of General Affairs, Japanese regulatory body, has been quite sensitive about the competitiveness issues and have been implementing different measures to push Japanese vendors to globalize, so I don't understand their line of thinking in this spectrum issue.

They claim that other uses, namely temporary broadcast and ITS (car-to-car communication), already occupy the rest of 700MHz.  Uh..hello?  Moshi moshi??  Can you hear me?  Economist Prof. Nobuo Ikeda writes in his several articles that the broadcast spectrum is only used for live cast of marathon races, and ITS usage is still in laboratory, after so many years.  I suspect the real reason is the political power struggle with broadcasters and automotive companies.

I can probably calculate and compare the present value of the current use and possible M2M/future mobile market, taking consideration of the cost of migration for the current owners and probability of ITS service really happening.  But even without taking pains to do so, it is a common sense that the potential M2M and mobile service has a LOT more values.

It is just a TOTAL INSANITY.  Japanese mobile industry is heading to suicide.  We should fight against it.

Michi

After "Wintel", comes "Googlcomm"?

I was at Telecom Council's seminar about Qualcomm's Snapdragon.  I have been quite interested in the collision of Qualcomm, the "mobile" corner, and Intel, the "PC" corner, and am hoping that this "battle" will create a new category in mobile, be it "smart book" (Q-version) or "MID" (I-version).

While I was listening to the presentation, the word "Googlcomm" came up to my mind, as Qualcomm is working closely with Google as the mobile OS platform, not just Android but also Chrome.

Does anybody have the rights to the word "Googlcomm"?  If not, I will claim it!!

Michi

Willcom heading to legal procedure and Japan's spectrum policy is questioned

Willcom logo

Nikkei reports that Willcom, Japan's No. 4 mobile carrier after NTT DoCoMo, au and Softbank, is going into a legal procedure similar to Chapter 11.  (Not exactly Chapter 11, as it is handled outside of the court, but still there will be a legal outside supervisor for their restructure.)

Willcom provides PHS (Personal Handiphone Service) system, which utilizes "half-duplex" type air interface and is used only in Japan and China.  It was originally conceived as an extension of cordless phone and as cheaper alternative to full cellular phones, but as cellular phone system got bigger and took on the economy of scale, the system lost the advantage.  A long, long time ago, it was.  And as the digital cellular system has been converged to 2 systems (GSM and CDMA, and eventually to one, LTE, in near future), PHS has become just another local, proprietary, limited technology.

But they survived.  When their price advantage in voice disappeared, they pushed the high-speed wireless data service.  It caught on to a niche but stable group of high-end data users.

That was a fine survival strategy for a niche player.  But the things got a strange turn when the government made 2.5GHz spectrum available in 2007.  Two licenses was made available, and Willcom got one of them in the "beauty contest" with its plan of "Next Generation PHS", XGP.  (The other was taken by UQ communications, KDDI-backed WiMAX carrier.)

There was another group backed by NTT, much more financially solid player, applied for the license, but Willcom was chosen.  The unwritten reason was rumored to be that their "PHS-XGP" technology was "made in Japan" and that the government wanted to push the in-house technology globally.

But looking at the situation from non-partial point of view, there was absolutely NO possibility that XGP would become the global standard at that time.  None.  Zilch.  Even the people at Willcom was not believing in it.  I think it was just a totally political decision.

So Willcom was burdened to deploy XGP by the government (the planned investment is estimated as 140 billion yen) even though they have 130 billion yen debt and their PHS subscriber is in steady decline.  Now Willcom is short of money, but nobody wants to put more capital under the current economy.

In a way, I believe that Willcom itself is the victim of the unrealistic government expectation.

Now, there is a debate that Japan should introduce spectrum auction system.  Opposition says that auction system may give the license to unqualified parties just because of the sum of money.  But as in this case, the government officials actually gave the license to an unqualified party for a non-business reason.  In Japan's telecom industry, spectrum policy will be a tough issue for the new Hatoyama government.

Michi

LA fire may destroy TV/radio/cell phone towers

Mount Wilson Observatory Director Hal McAlister said Monday in an ongoing blog that the U.S. Forest Service informed him that passage of the fire across Mount Wilson was imminent. The USFS also said firefighters would battle the blaze from the air rather than on the ground.

via news.cnet.com

The wildfire in Los Angeles area is approaching Mt. Wilson, where many radio wave towers are concentrated. That means TV, radio and cellular phone connections in the nearby area may be lost.

So I learned the name "Mount Wilson" with this fire. I have to remember that.

Michi

NEC to combine mobile handset business with Casio Hitachi

Breaking news - Yomiuri newspaper reports that NEC is considering merging their mobile handset business with Casio Hitachi, although no source is specified and the article sounds speculative.Japan's largest handset vendor is Sharp with 22% market share, second is Panasonic with 17%. If NEC (12%) gets together with Casio (5%) and Hitachi (4%), then they jumps up to the second position. Casio and Hitachi have already set up a joint venture Casio Hitachi, and NEC is reported to invest into this JV, holds more than 50% and combines their production facility. Panasonic, by the way, has acquired the handset business from Sanyo recently. NEC is a major vendor to DoCoMo/W-CDMA, and Casio Hitachi is KDDI/CDMA camp, so the combination makes much more sense than NEC-Panasonic talk about combining their development platform together - which was on the news some time ago, and I don't what happened to it after that. I have been advocating that Japanese vendors have to consolidate QUICKLY. Better late than never!! Michi

Japan's desruptive mobile carrier "E-Mobile"

I am at Wireless Japan conference in Tokyo.  It is my second time here, and instantly noticed that the number of booths has shrunk quite a bit this year than before, due to the bad economy.  Hearing the presentations of the top Japanese carriers is as gloomy as the number of attendance.

The only executives who provided bright spots were DoCoMo, the top carrier, and the underdog E-Mobile.  DoCoMo is the Japanese version of Verizon.  With its strong network and more than 50% market share, and now with more focused strategy, they are stably strong.  They are doing everything you can think of, because they can afford anything.  That was expected.

Less boring is the story about E-Mobile.  They started as a subsidiary of eAccess, ADSL startup, who is considered the only successful Japanese venture in telecommunication, and raised money mostly from foreign investors, such as Goldman Sachs, Temasec (Singapore), and Hong Kong strategic investors.  The company is headed by a foreigner (Eric Gan, COO) so are the majority of the board members.

E-Mobile started the service in 2007, and currently has almost 1.5 Million subscribers.  Although the accumulated number of subs is miniscule compared to major carriers (DoCoMo has 50 Million), but in terms of net sub increase share, E-Mobile holds more than 1/4, and is at the top for the first half of 2009.  So-called Lehman Shock in fall 09 did not affect their growth pace at all.

Their technology is not anything unique - just an ordinary 3G.  What makes them unique is that their service is maximized for data service.  They have develped much smaller and cheaper base station (1/10 of investment, lower running cost), proviced by Ericsson and Huawei (instead of tranditional Japanese vendors).  They have procured cheap "net books" originally from Taiwan and started selling with subsidy, just as the mobile handsets.  "Net book" bundle strategy was hugely successful, and now that Japanese vendors have started to produce, net books accounts for 1/4 of total notebook PC sales in Japan.

Their base package is 1,000 yen per month minimum, and the new "light" plan even goes down to 580 yen if you don't use the data.  With such light starting point, most users (90%) only use data (although they DO have voice package, with MVNO arrangement), which means the users have a separate mobile phone.  They are introducing 21Mbps service in August, so you can ditch the landline ADSL altogether.

Their largest weak point is coverage, but because they only serve data customers, poor coverage in rural area is not as costly as others.  I tried their USB dangle at my parents' home in Tokyo suburb, and had no problem using it - easy to set up, and fast enough for basic net usage.  They have prepaid plan, too, so if you visit Tokyo for business frequently, you can buy the dangle and pay only for the days you use.

After 2 years of service, their existance is still quite small among Japanese big 3 carriers, but they are the typical "desruptive" technology, defined in Christensen's "Innovator's Dilenma".  They are still a private company and is not announcing the financials, but looks riding along to a pernament existance in Japan - and personally, I am looking forward to seeing such international innovator making it in Japan, and will potentially change its rather closed and slow-moving culture.

Michi

Japan's Mobile WiMax starts on Feb. 26

UQ Communications, a group company of KDDI, will start providing Japan's first mobile WiMax service "UQ WiMax" in Tokyo, Yokohama and Kawasaki on February 26, 2009.  They will eventually expand the service through Tokyo-Nagoya-Osaka corridor.  The article reports that they will focus the coverage in major train stations.

The service plan will be 4480 yen (approx. $45) flat per month, and the maximum downward speed will be 40Mbps, upward 10Mbps.

CNET Japan 2/3/2009

They will provide free trial service until June 30.

Globally, WiMax has shrunk down to a niche service for emerging countries lately, but UQ has to start the service because of their oblitagion to the government as a spectrum licensee.  With the economic environment as grim in Japan as everywhere else, it is a tough start for UQ.

But you never know.  Things sometimes work differently in Japan.  I never expected E-Mobile does such a good job getting people to use their "Net Books" (small and cheap wireless-net-enabled PC, which is provided for free to users with carrier's subsidy), so it may be another case.

Anyway, I HAVE to get there before 6/30 to try it out for free myself.

Michi

Gphone vs. iPhone - the concept behind Android

I got hold of the first Android phone - T-Mobile G1 - last night in San Francisco, where the "pre-sale" was held from 6pm.

Without too much going into the technical details, here is my impression about G1.

  1. Form factor:  I am in strong belief that the form factor is the #1 key for success for mass-oriented mobile phone.  With Andy Rubin, former Danger guy, in the helm, G1 definitely has inherited the cool "smell" of Sidekick that appeals to the young folks.  (Although the hardware is made by HTC, I heard from the industry source that Google had a lot to say about the hardware design.)  It was much sleeker than I thought, and feel how the screen opens up - a bit to the side and up - is "Sidekick"-like "fun" factor.
  2. Cloud factor:  Smartphone market is exploding this year, and with the entry of Apple and Google, the main focus of smartphone market is how it relates to "cloud computing".  In that sense, iPhone is "Web1.0" handset whereas Android is "Web2.0".  iPhone is basically a beautiful "viewer" of the contents, including iTunes contents and website.  With iPhone, you can buy the professionally made contents and see it on the phone, whereas with G1, the screen is much smaller and less beautiful, Android market is not developed yet, YouTube doesn't work very well, but it is much easier to input text and make phone calls.  It is very true to the basic "mobile phone" function, which may also be the DNA of Sidekick.  It also is still "work in process", as open source OS, so it may get better over the years, but at this moment, iPhone looks much more "complete product".  With all its power and shortcomings combined, G1 is the "Web2.0" type handset.

I will probably come up with other stuff, but here is my brief impression about G1.

G1vsiPhone

Michi